ACTION ITEMS:

From Last Meeting

This Week



Agenda

Meeting Materials



Recording

Recording: Activity Streams - Activity Types: Moving closer to the standard (2021-08-16)

Notes

Notes were taken directly in the Activity Streams document as comments with general discussions captured here.


Audience

From audience perspective…


Is there an audience that would prefer a notification only?

Include rdf_patch?

For LC, Stream has just URI and that that entity was updated.


How do the end users know what was changed?

Are change management documents…


With notification, the consumer can decide what to do with it.

Is it acceptable to expand the activity stream as notification to be activity stream with change documents?

If it’s there and you don’t want it, just ignore it.

If it’s not there and you need it, there are extra steps that would be required.  What would those extra changes be?

If we include rdf_patch, what happens if the changes are very large? (e.g. https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2008054754.madsrdf.nt)

What if we included a parameter on the activity stream request to have verbose=true|false, where rdf_patch is only included with verbose=true.

Doesn’t seem like it would be a big deal to have to do two steps to get each change… 1) read the notification in the activity stream, 2) follow relationship URL to get the rdf_patch

Complete History vs. Recent Notifications

Complete history =

Recent Notifications = 



Processing…


Need to provide the authoritative patch sequence.  If I modified on July 1, and then take a patch on Aug 1, how can I refer to the changes if the changes in the later patch if they were adjusted in a way in the July patch.

Following the process of 


What happens if a site gets out of order?  Is there a way to replay from a known state?

Periodic whole sale replacement.  Having this regularly allows for confidence in the data integrity.  A long running patch might cause problems over time.

Medline does a baseline replacement once a year.  After that, you have to apply patches in order.

Providing RDF patch could be optional.  For authorities that can provide a patch, then we provide a spec for what that would look like.  For authorities that do not track low level information, this would be no worse than what they currently have.




Future Topics



Attendees:

Dave Eichmann
Christine Eslao
Nancy Fallgren
Steven Folsom
Kevin Ford
John Graybeal
Jim Hahn
Kirk Hess
Jesse Lambertson
Anna Lionetti
Alessandra Moi
Erik Radio
Lynn Ransom
Lynette Rayle
Greg Reeve
Amanda Sprochi
Emma Thomson


Absent:

Tiziana Possemato
Vitus Tang