First goal: DASH! dashboard (full page for entity) that extends on the idea of an embedded knowledge panel, aim to have functional prototype for end of year
DASH! (Displaying Authorities Seamlessly Here)
Dashboard design meeting kickoff notes - will also try to understand what our data will support or connections to other data sources
Tim working on changes to entity pages for authors, may incorporate some usability feedback
Future work: should review work based on usability tests. Perhaps make a few more changes (e.g. entity pages for subject and authors look more different than they need to (e.g. relations back to catalog)) the wrap this work until more discussion in August
Usability testing for DASH
2021-04-02 - Four people responded to request and have scheduled tests for next week (Apr 7 & 9), will review entity pages
2021-04-16 - Usability testing is underway, will finish next week. Useful input on what users see/understand and what they struggle with. Users don't know what a repository is, can guess what digital collections means. Users tend to think that the author name link will get more information, don't see/understand info button – could mean adding tool tips and/or making button more obvious or even flip button/link or one link for info+search
Had user reps meeting 2021-04-09 and result was "not no"
Positive feedback on linking back to catalog results
Questions about links and display from wikidata, other sources
End was to discuss more in August with possible discussion of how to move into production
User reps have slides and wanted demo link
Could have lite KP might to start, possible later entity pages – or perhaps both together
Next Demo that Needs New Acronym
Expect to include Works. Need to do something beyond what we already have live from the OCLC concordance data.
Full OCLC concordance us 343M rows, and gzipped the file is 3.3GB
SVDE Works
2021-02-26 Have to develop SPARQL queries to pull out certain sorts of connected Work. Don't expect data to be very dense but do expect that we would get useful connections between print and electronic for example. We already have a link based on the OCLC concordance file from several years ago.
ACTION - Steven Folsom and Huda Khan to work on building an equivalent of the OCLC concordance file based on SVDE data and then do a comparison to see how they are similar and different
2021-04-02 Steven and Huda met to think about putting together queries to extract a similar dataset. (Document for recording queries). Open questions about the counts – got 16k works from one view, got about 8k where limited to case with at least one instance. These numbers are much much lower than expected
2021-04-16 Steven working with Dave on how to pull our SVDE data. Dave still working through some errors in ingest of SVDE data – this needs to be resolved before looking for concordance. Has asked Frances for 2015 concordance
eResources
Discussion with small group regarding call number classifications on e-resources, where there is/isn't sufficient metadata compared to equivalent/related physical objects. Possibility of gathering some useful examples around needs/wishes around e-resource discovery.
2021-03-26 - Other CUL staff met a couple of weeks ago. Examples where print and e-resource versions have differing metadata quality. Can we connect the resources better and/or copy metadata from one to the other? Has connection to our work to identify different versions. Nothing for LD4P3 to do until they have come up with appropriate examples
How do our new mockups support ideas of local overrides or correction to address DEI issues?
Question of process for reporting and dealing with errors
Use of wikidata means that individuals can make some changes there - direct citation in the data makes that plain and more easily actionable
Subject headings
Currently we don't show how many other headings a sub-heading appears in, this could be calculated
E.g. if someone is looking at "Architecture - Norway" would it be useful to see other headings that include Norway. Or would a use simply search for Norway?
Questions about whether some types of subheading (such as temporal or spatial) might be more usefully connect than others
Perhaps see if this comes up in the testing
2021-04-16 - When we have better understanding of Work data, go back to group to discuss possibilities for e-resources
Publisher authorities/ids
At Cornell we haven't tried to connect authorities with publishes
LC working on connecting to publisher identifiers - utility is things also published by a publisher
Released to production the new indexing scheme. This release cleans up all tests with known failures marked as pending. Added in a few UI improvements to remove inactive authorities from the Monitor Status page, adjust the threshold for marking an authorities uptime as concerning, and on the Check Status page show a dogear for pending accuracy tests.
Need to think about how best we represent recent status for authorities https://lookup.ld4l.org/monitor_status. Lynette has been working on two thread: uptime fraction and performance/speed
Agree to change window to last month to give better indication or recent status
In the weekly meeting, we identified the ShareVDE/PCC data interactions as a topic for the larger group in the quarterly meeting next week. We also discussed potential topics around lookup enhancements. The following topics would be discussed in the weekly Qa/Sinopia meeting.
compare list of priorities identified in the working group with what’s available now in Sinopia
review Astrid’s mockups and compare with Sinopia current UI
discuss and prioritize additional UI improvements
discuss which authorities are supported and whether we should be looking at additional authorities
In ShareVDE meeting, it was highly focused on the needs of the Stanford team. Discussed question of how to transform data in and out of SVDE
Membership is complete with 14 members. Producers include LOC, OCLC, MeSH, ShareVDE who have an interest in the creation of change management documents. Dave is joining the group to represent the needs of downstream consumers of change management documents. There is a poll out to determine the date of the first meeting.
Purpose: Vision for mid-term (3-5 years) transition to support linked-data at Cornell. May include things we don't yet have or cannot yet do, but not long-term vision of post-MARC environment
Important to understand sources of truth (primary data) and where there is derivative data
Imagine landscape with items described in multiple formats including at least MARC, BF, DC (eCommons), JSTOR
Imagine all items indexed and discoverable via D&A
2021-04-02 Jason/Steven/Simeon discussed Jason's work on a merged CUL ecosystem diagram, plan to discuss on 2021-04-16
Other Topics
PCC/Sinopia and SVDE shape analysis
2021-03-19 Steven has been working through a spreadsheet of 400+ lines to compare the shape of SVDE data with the PCC/Sinopia profile. He is finding that there are many many differences which will severely limit how well Sinopia will be able to consume and edit SVDE data. For the purposes of QA/Sinopia cloning, Steven could come up with some ldpaths but not sure whether the amount of data will be useful. Steven expects to be able to share the spreadsheet at the next Sinopia/SVDE meeting. Going forward we need to consider the role of versioning/documenting shape changes and validation at both scale and single descriptions. Justin's validation scripts: https://github.com/LD4P/dctap. Tom Baker's csv2shex: https://github.com/tombaker/csv2shex
2021-03-26 Steven finished working through the spreadsheet comparing SVDE data with the PCC profile. Notes that he is looking only from the side of the PCC profile and would thus miss other things in SVDE data. Patterns around different types of work in SVDE data (e.g. Opus and other higher level works have very different shapes). Difficult pattern of double-reified relationships between works. Steven will let SVDE/QA folks know about completion of the work. Need to find a way toward alignment.
ACTION - Steven Folsom to write up state of current analysis and store a snapshot of the spreadsheet on the LD4P3 wiki
2021-04-02 - Started...
OCLC Linked Data / Entities Advisory Group
2021-04-02 Michelle asked about connecting QA to the OCLC Entity Backbone as part of updates for partner meeting, Lynette has reached out about API
2021-04-09 Lynette has not heard back yet from OCLC
PCC Task Group on Non-RDA Entities
2021-03-19 Group headed by standing committee on standards will formally propose a list of non-RDA entity types. Steven will join. Deliverables by June
2021-04-02 Many participants involved in ILS/LSP migrations so work delayed until July
Hope to include URIs as part of Cornell FOLIO migration, possible LD4P work
2021-04-09: CUL-IT in favor of proposal but resourcing will have to wait until after FOLIO. (URIs are cool.)
Upcoming meetings
https://kula.uvic.ca/index.php/kula/announcement/view/1. Call for Proposals - Special Issue: "The Metadata Issue: Metadata as Knowledge". Due January 31, 2021 (abstract 300-500 words). Includes "The use of linked open data to facilitate the interaction between metadata and bodies of knowledge" and "Cultural heritage organization (libraries, archives, galleries, and museums) and academic projects that contribute to or leverage open knowledge platforms such as Wikidata"