Steven Folsom keep track of cataloger perspective on work to support LC Names is in QA with context
2019-03-15 - Dave is focused on SHARE-VDE as his top priority (https://github.com/LD4P/qa_server/issues/16), when that has been moved forward we need to emphasize our other priorities again:
https://github.com/LD4P/qa_server/issues/53 - SF 2019-04-05, RWOs added, now need to test if when searching RWOs, if data from the Authority comes back to in the context → Steven Folsomto follow up with Sinopia team about how to QA/Dave can support getting from Authority to RWO; also follow up with LC about reciprocal properties between RWO and Authority (currently has only Authority to RWO). If Sinopia cannot do Authority→RWO and LC cannot for RWO→Authority in a timely fashion then we might need to add the generation of reciprocal link in DAVE indexing process
Steven Folsom to reach out to Nancy to see what data we get from the "Profiles Wrangler" survey about QA needs, will then reach out to cohort to check results and see if anything is missing
2019-03-08 - Received a confirmation from Nancy that they are happy to share. The survey closes 2019-03-08.
2019-03-15 - Paloma mentioned before the survey closed that https://www.rbms.info/vocabularies/ and http://www.ligatus.org.uk/lob/ were named. Waiting for a complete list. The former, I (Steven) don't believe, is LOD; we'll have to confirm and come up with a plan.
List of datasets named in the Profile Wrangler Survey:
2019-04-05 - SF, for datasets with no RDF, Nancy is explaining to the cohort that RDF is needed for lookups, and hoping the cohort have the resources/experience to convert to RDF.
RBMS (No RDF yet, but the editorial group is working towards it)
Steven Folsom will make sure there is a github issue for each vocabulary and try to find an owner for each. We will need to find out whether there are URIs for these terms – might not be able to support all
2019-03-29 Issues not yet in github
2019-04-05 - SF everything that has RDF has an Issue; has asked profiles leaders to discuss with cohort issue with non-RDF authorities, do they have effort to do the conversion?
E. Lynette Rayle LDPath gem has two problems: 1) bug in LDPath parsing paths, 2) it is doing load for graph every time it tries to access something (SLOW)... may need to fork LDPath gem to make more efficient since will not need to reload graph every time (for our use case)
2019-04-05 - Both issues are resolved. ldpath has been move to samvera-labs so Lynette and other can maintain. The parse issue is resolved by use of parenthesis (when specifying context is it useful for do as an ldpath in spreadsheet. see LCNAF issue), the performance issue has been fixed by adding "do-not-go-out-to-network" flag. DONE
E. Lynette Rayle investigate & document algorithm for selection of languages with label and/or no label. In cases like AgroVoc where languages are handled well then we just want to document the (good) algorithm; but in other cases where language information is wrong we need to be able to turn that off (need more config for this). Motivation is that we want good documentation in order to be able to discuss cases where language data is bad and we need settings to ignore it. Should be done in time for May meetings.
2019-03-22 - Documentation has been started but still has some TODOs to fill in information. Created issue to track (Issue #61)
Jason Kovariwill discuss in LTS whether there a URIs from Share-VDE data that are useful and might be added to catalog
2019-03-29 We have what is expected to be the final dump of SHARE-VDE effort. Hope to look at it soon. Then have discussion in LTS – people will need to see / explore data before forming opinions on utility
2019-04-05 Have dump and is in DAVE, but hasn't been investigated yet
Tim has demonstration of Discogs lookup hooked into Sinopia per https://github.com/LD4P/qa_server/issues/49 , working on getting some data in from the Discogs QA authority through Sinopia configuration
E. Lynette Rayle to re-review Tim's 3 PRs for QA and get a community reviewer
Michelle (2019-03-21, email): "June in-person partner meeting in DC: planning hasn't started yet, it would be good to have at least one person from each of Cornell/Harvard/Iowa SLIS/LC/PCC/Stanford involved in the planning. Let me know if you want to take part."
Partner meeting is day after cohort; can we wait to plan until after May meeting?