You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

LDCX at Stanford from March 23 to 25, 2015 resulted in a broad unconference agenda covering range of pertinent projects and developments in the library and museum community. Below are a few notes and take-aways that were particularly relevant to Fedora 4.

  1. PCDM examples
    1. In an effort to bring some reality and clarity to how the Portland Common Data Model (PCDM) can be applied to existing repository use cases, the following collection-types were mapped into PCDM
      1. Sufia / ScholarSphere - implementation of PCDM to extend Sufia Generic file capability to support complex works 
      2. GeoHydra - implementation of PCDM for GIS
      3. Simple Postcard Example
      4. Disk Image Example
      5. Book
  2. PCDM JSON-LD @context
    1. During a session detailing JSON-LD, it was suggested that a relatively simple and straight-forward exercise of creating a JSON-LD @context for the PCDM would go a long way towards facilitating consistent usage of JSON-LD
    2. If you are interested in JSON-LD and/or PCDM, here is a ticket for this high-value, low-effort community contribution.
      1. Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.
  3. PCDM deploying to pcdm.org with scripts
    1. In order to automate the deployment of the PCDM ontology based on updates to the 'master' branch, an auto-deploy setup should be established along the lines of the IIIF prior arg
      1. https://github.com/duraspace/pcdm
      2. https://github.com/IIIF/iiif.io
  4. Mega-thread discussion and next steps
    1. Server-managed triples (SMT)

      1. SMTs should be satisfied by the existing 'Prefer' header on GET requests (Prefer: return=representation; omit="http://fedora.info/definitions/v4/repository#ServerManaged")

      2. This should be verified under a variety of scenarios

        1. Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

    2. non-repo subjects

    3. LDPRS by client

  5. Look into cost of JBoss to work ModeShape ticket:
    1. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODE-2109

  6. Make clear to community that F4 does not require end of XML datastreams
  7. Interest in moving F4 towards Memento for versioning

 

  • No labels