Page tree

Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

titleAbout ArtFrame

In collaboration with the Art Libraries Society of North America's Cataloging Advisory Committee (ARLIS CAC), the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, The Clark Library, and the Morgan Library & Museum, Columbia University Libraries led an effort to develop ArtFrame

, led by Columbia University, is an extension of BIBFRAME to describe art objects, both two-dimensional (e.g., paintings, photographs) and three-dimensional (e.g., sculptures, ceramics).

Columbia Project Proposal

  • Application profile for the linked data description of art objects
  • Representative selection of BIBFRAME descriptions of art objects
  • Evaluation and publication of project findings
titleCurrent Activities


  • Starting development of application profile for ArtFrame.
  • Finalizing measurements, condition/preservation, and provenance modeling (together with RareMat Extension)

    , a BIBFRAME ontology extension for the description of two-and three-dimensional artworks. For questions or comments, please contact Melanie Wacker, Metadata Coordinator, Columbia University Libraries: mw2064 [ at ] columbia dot edu

    Columbia Project Proposal

    View ArtFrame work on GitHub

    NOTE:As described in the next section, this effort developed into the Art & Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension.

    NOTE: As of June 2018, the Art Libraries Society of North America's Cataloging Advisory Committee has begun to explore continued development and maintenance of ARM, in partnership with RBMS' Bibliographic Standards Committee and other community partners.

    The Art & Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension

    The Art & Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension (ARM), and the ontologies housed in the ARM GitHub repository have been developed as extensions of the BIBFRAME ontology for generalized bibliographic description to provide specialized modeling in the art and rare materials domains. These were originally conceived of as two separate projects: Columbia University led ArtFrame, an ontology extension for the description of two-and three-dimensional artworks, in collaboration with the Art Libraries Society of North America's Cataloging Advisory Committee (ARLIS CAC), the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, The Clark Library, and the Morgan Library & Museum. Meanwhile, Cornell University led the Rare Materials Ontology Extension (RareMat) in collaboration with the ACRL Rare Books and Manuscript Section's Bibliographic Standards Committee (RBMS-BSC); RareMat was intended to provide modeling for the complexity of rare materials, particularly item-level description not addressed in BIBFRAME.

    As work proceeded, it became apparent that many of the modeling needs of the two groups overlapped: physical description, physical condition and conservation, custodial history, measurements, awards and exhibitions, and so on. It was thus decided to merge the projects and jointly develop a single set of models.

    Meanwhile, select models were considered separable from the core models, amenable to independent implementation by users within and outside the bibliographic domain. These models have been pulled out of the core ontology into three modularized ontologies: awards, custodial history, and measurements.

    In addition to the ontologies, the group has generated several other outputs:

    • A set of controlled vocabularies for arrangement of physical objects (e.g., rolled and unrolled), origin (e.g., of titles), status (e.g., of identifiers), typefaces, and handwriting types.
    • Detailed documentation of each model. These include use cases; model overviews, with motivation and rationale in reference to the use cases and legacy data; diagrams; RDF samples; term specifications; recommendations for future modifications to BIBFRAME, where applicable; and lists of related topics out-of-scope of the current project but of interest for future research.
    • Application profiles, formalized in SHACL and accompanied by external ontologies and vocabularies, to support form and display interfaces in VitroLib, an RDF cataloging tool under development in the associated Linked Data for Libraries Labs project. Two application profiles are under development: art and rare monographs. Also included are fragments of source ontologies and vocabularies used in the application profiles and modeling recommendations.
    • Experimental: SHACL validation profiles stored with the associated ontologies, which can be used as a basis for application profiles but whose primary purpose is to define expected implementation of the ontologies independent of any application. Some proof-of-concept application profiles are built on the validation SHACL in this way; when the profiles are complete we will evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of refactoring all the application profiles according to this model. Currently available are core validation and custodial_history SHACL shapes.

    titleCompleted Work

    Use Case Development

    • Defined use cases for description of art
    • Classified use cases into entity types
    • Prioritized use cases

    • Analyzed use cases and developed ontology requirements

    • Compared ArtFrame use cases to Rare Material use cases and identified commonalities


    OWL file development

    • Core Ontology
    • Award Ontology
    • Custodial History Ontology
    • Measurement Ontology
    • Activity Ontology
      • The issue of whether to adopt the BIBFRAME Contribution model or the bibliotek-o Activity model has not yet been resolved. As a temporary accommodation, the Activity model is used, but the terms are stored in a separate ontology file with a distinct namespace for easy separation. The expectation is that either (1) the Activity model will be adopted, and the terms merged into the ARM Core Ontology, or (2) the BIBFRAME Contribution model will be adopted, the Activity ontology deprecated, and other associated revisions to the ARM ontologies and vocabularies be implemented.
      • Ontology specification
      • Human-readable documentation

    Application Profiles (SHACL)

    In-Person Meetings




    Arden Alexander (Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs)
    Penny Baker

    (Clark Art Institute)
    Andrea Puccio

    (Clark Art Institute)

    Amber Billey (Columbia/OSMC)

    Roberto Ferrari (Columbia/Art Properties)
    Paul Frank (Library of Congress)
    Kate Harcourt (Columbia/OSMC)
    Robert Rendall (Columbia/OSMC)
    Margaret Smithglass (Columbia/Avery)
    Melanie Wacker (Columbia/OSMC)
    Amber Billey (Bard College)
    Timothy Ryan Mendenhall (Columbia/OSMC)

    Members of ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee:
    William Blueher (Metropolitan Museum of Art) (November 2017- )
    Marie-Chantal L'Écuyer-Coelho (Bibliotheque et Archives nationales Québec)
    John A. Mair (Pratt Institute)
    Elizabeth O'Keefe (November 2017- )
    Andrea Puccio (Clark Art Institute)
    Sherman Clarke (freelance art cataloger)
    Bronwen Bitetti (Bard College)
    Tamara Fultz (Metropolitan Museum of Art) (2016-November 2017)
    Maria Oldal (Morgan Library & Museum)
    Karen Stafford (Art Institute of Chicago)
    Samantha Deutch (Frick Collection)

    Link to working documents (for partners only)


    Completed Work

    Last updated 03/31/2017

    Months 11-12 (February-March 2017)

    Month 9- 10 (December 2016-January 2017)

    Month 8 (November 2016) 

     Months 5-7 (August-October 2016)

    • Continue use case development

    • Group related use cases

    • Prioritize use cases

    • Develop ontology requirements based on use cases

    • Contribute MARCXML test records for LD4L MARC to BIBFRAME converter development

      Month 4 (July 2016) 

    • Create Art Extension Group that now includes members of the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, the ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee and Penny Baker from the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute. First call held July 6, 2016; followed by regular bi-weekly calls

    • Develop use cases (more than 30 by end of July)


    • Ontology extension to BIBFRAME 2.0 for describing art objects
    • Application profile for the linked data description of art objects
    • Data models for handling materiality, provenance, titles, and other concepts relevant to describing art objects
    • Ontology documentation, including modeling illustrations