Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • CERIF2VIVO
    • Discussion of the comments in the CERIF review document - Melanie Wacker Tatiana Walther Salm, feedback from CERIF (Dragan Ivanovic) would be valuable.
    • Salm:
      • Using SSSOM approach, using mapping_predicate with skos properties,  mapping_justification etc.
      • Mapping review took place in a copy of the original review document 
      • 3 reviews (1. Salm; 2. Melanie; 3. Tatiana Walther) - each review displays a particular/individual understanding of the mapping
      • colours added:
        • red - attention: has to be discussed, reviewed again by someone with VIVO experience
        • yellow - is an exact match, but can maybe treated differently
        • colours for mapping confidence are red, yellow, green (green being absolutely confident; 1). 
  • Disciplines assigned to roles
      • Dragan and Brian volunteered to do the final reviews. Dragan will start as reviewer 4 to address CERIF specific issues; Brian will then do the concluding 5th review.
      • Melanie: Some comments address general VIVO ontology issues (like missing equivalences that should be added to VIVO). These comments should be extracted systematically at a later point in time. 
      • Mapping maintenance should be discussed later, but it's absolutely needed - especially if VIVO ontology changes, and when the CERIF refactoring project goes forward. 
  • New new properties
    • Mastodon ID
      • accepted to add it as an identifier
      • could be part of the identifier ontology by Mike
      • maybe adding it as a hot patch to VIVO ontology first
      • Brian and Christian will prepare a proposal until next Ontology meeting  
    • isRetracted
    • lastUpdated
  • Use of SPAR C4O (citation information) - experiences, something to reuse? 
  • Postponed agenda items:
    • Disciplines assigned to roles
    • new properties
      • isRetracted
      • lastUpdated