Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Success would mean Fedora6 is something we can use and the steps for migration would be clear
  • Something we can use: 
    • Requirements: 
      • Migration performance 
        • how many objects representing
        • how much data migrated in
        • how much time
    • Are the development targets outlined by the Fedora 6 design summary aligned with NLM's needs?
    • Concern around external content
      • Current F3 stack makes heavy use of external content
      • How to use an external content model with the Fedora6 / OCFL design?
      • Would we (NLM) have to bring in all the external binaries into Fedora ?  Or is would it make sense to use external content?
        • OCFL objects can point to external content (via a URI)
        • NLM would always have the option to bring in the content into OCFL later.
        • Having binaries and metadata collocated is a principle of OCFL not  a requirement
    • Concerns around RDF and LDP: 

Timelines / Responsibilities

  • Two sprints for fedora - September  and November
  • We're looking at year long road map with Fedora 6 + migration tooling
  • Aiming to wrap up the pilot around this time next year.
  • Does that timeline seem reasonable to NLM? 
    • Busy through September
    • Overall timeframe looks good 
  • Sample data:  
    • Andrew Woods  is moving migration-utils project forward insofar as it is writing to OCFL directly
    • It would be helpful to vet the performance characteristics of that migration approach. 
    • Having a Fedora3 tar file would be useful for us to run some tests in the short term.
    • One initial test would be to run migration utils without writing anything on the fedora to establish a baseline for performance.
    • 60 TBs and 10 million objects
  • How important is it to retain your own URIs? 
    • Currently permalinks are stored in the object metadata
    • NLM does not care so much that Fedora 3 URLs change in the migration.
      • Fedora URLs are used in NLMs architecture so changing the code that resolves fedora links will have to change, but that is not a big deal.

Communication:

  • As sprints kick-off the Fedora team will need feedback on progress.  
  • NLM's participation in the weekly tech calls and  #fedora6-pilot would be very helpful.

Actions

  • Danny Bernstein  to bring in the question of external binaries in OCFL in the weekly tech call.  Pilot partners should feel free to raise the issue on in the #fedora6-pilots slack channel
  • Andrew Woods  to schedule a dedicated call to discuss URLs as URIs for digital objects.  
  • Nancy Fallgren and everyone in the current meeting  to review the thread and make sure to raise any issues that are not touched on in the thread.
  • Andrew Woods  to work with Doron Shalvi  on determining the way forward re sample data