...
- Some objectives seem less concrete (how would "identifying mutual benefit" manifest itself).
- Hosted VIVO seems provocative.
- LYR should be an asset on mktg more than DuraSpace
- Governance & autonomy is key; this is well put.
- Tapping into LYR markets & communication channels is a big opportunity for VIVO
- Governance should happen quickly
- Support should happen quickly
- Growth needs to be the focus.
- Good statement overall.
- Gov. Obj 3: how would we identify mutual benefit? What does that mean?
- Kristi & Carol at DuraSpace have been great with mktg; if we think VIVO mktg challenges came from DuraSpace, we may need to also think how VIVO could be better at providing mktg messages, channel, focus, content, etc.
- The option of hosted services should be discussed very carefully and with inclusion of current and potentially future service providers
- This is a lot of objectives; are there specific, "top 3" priorities we might focus on?
- It would be good if Erin were on the call / could join this discussion
- What about experiences from other projects? AW says there have been conversations about ideas and people being pooled in the new division, not being segmented.
- How should Leadership Group be engaged in these discussions? Is a big meeting useful? Should the first meeting be of the LG on this document?
- We need a simpler product. Something that opens up VIVO to adoption by much smaller sites, such as LYR members. Hosted services could be key to this. Also VIVO Scholar (but not clear where that is)
- VIVO in LYR mission? Important. (See #4, Governance)
- What would a VIVO mean for archives, or museums? Interesting thought exercise.