Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Correct typos

...

  1. Discuss/prioritize initial list of High-level Requirements
    1. Pick a list of requirements that could potentially drive first sprint(s)
    2. See comments on high-level requirements page:
      1. Are deployment-related issues appropriate as requirements, or are they goals?
        1. If they are goals, do we have other items that are also goals, but not requirements? 
      2. Is it appropriate for an API-X extension to use native java APIs such as fcrepo-kernel-api, or should they use standardized and codified fedora HTTP APIs?
  2. Discuss list of potential Proof of Concept ideas.  Do we want to pursue one or more of these as a team?  Individually?
  3. Rough implementation timeline

 

Minutes

Agenda Item 1: Review initial list of High Level Requirements

...

E.M./A.B. proposed HTTP RFC compatability compatibility as a design decision consideration *ACTION*

A.C. Clarified that the items in #2 Patterns are not exclusive

...

A.B. *ACTION* to add this clarifying language to the high level reqirementsrequirements.

 

A.B. Review item 3, now Service Discovery & Binding

...

E.M. Suggested a high-level roadmap would be useful

A.B. Proposed assembing assembling the details/goals of the first sprint and then discussing them at the next meeting

...