Versions Compared

Old Version 17

changes.mady.by.user Nick Ruest

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Andrew Woods

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  • Review of the requirements from Phase 1:
    • RDF
    • Binaries
    • References
    • Support transacting in RDF – yes.
    • Support including Binaries in export – yes.
    • Support references to other resources – yes: There was some related discussion here Discussion of external references and the creation of binary placeholder files.
    • action Action item: Josh will create a ticket for handling this 
    • LDP contains predicate
    • deciding the best way to handle this (not create this binary or for the verification tooling to better handle it when encountered).
    • Support import into a non-existing container – yes.
    • Support export of resource and members based on "LDP:contains" predicate – yes.
    • The URIs of round-tripped resources should be the same (assuming the same base repository URI): yes, but with an asterisk because of Round-tripping: yes with an asterisk for the pair-tree issue (FCREPO-2240).
  • Outstanding issues: pairtree The biggest one is the pair-tree issue mentioned above.
  • Open tickets:
  • Getting more stakeholder feedback:
    • Would a template such as that employed for release testing be useful?
    • This There is a danger that this could box them stakeholders into testing in a pre-defined way that is not helpful.
    • Action Itemitem: Josh will create a single wiki page with links to the tooling and instructions that to which stakeholders can be directed to.
    • It seems reasonable to ping folks who signed up but who have not yet provided feedback.
  • Prioritizing work for December sprint:
    • The consensus was that cleanup of the open issues is a requirement before the Bagit work starts.
    • The bug fixes may not be an enormous amount of work but with the current commitments it may not be possible to get to the Bagit phase of work in December.
    • If we can get more developer commitments we can hopefully get to some of Phase 2 as well.
    • Action item: Nick will approach some ~5 developers he has in mind to try to recruit additional participants.
  • Additional interested potential stakeholders introduced themselves and described their use-cases.