Release date: 30 31 August, 2016
We are proud to announce the release of Fedora 4.6.0.
...
A. Soroka, University of Virginia
- Aaron Birkland, Johns Hopkins University
Unknown User (acoburn), Amherst College
Aaron Elkiss, University of Michigan
- Andrew Woods, DuraSpace
- Benjamin Armintor, Columbia University
- Bethany Seeger, Amherst College
- Bill Branan, DuraSpace
- Esme Cowles, Princeton University
- Jared Whiklo, University of Manitoba
- Michael Durbin, University of Virginia
- Michael J. Giarlo, Stanford University
- Mirek Simek, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
- Mohamed Mohideen Abdul Rasheed, University of Maryland
- Nick Ruest, York University
- Peter Eichman, University of Maryland
- Yinlin Chen, Virginia Tech
Issue Reporters
Summary
The Fedora 4.6.0 release furthers several major objectives:
- Tighten the definition of the RESTful application programming interface (API)
- Improving Refining the Versioning capabilitymessaging service
- Use Re-establish performance test fixtures to examine the effects of different backends
- Improve durability with by encouraging the use of MySQL and PostgreSQL backends
- Deprecation of legacy Transform service
- Fix bugs
This release will be the last release built against a version of Modeshape that uses Infinispan for data storage.
Excerpt |
---|
Note |
---|
This release is a major release (i.e. 4.6.0 instead of 4.5.2) because there are several REST API updates that are not backwards compatible with 4.5.x. The following, deprecated, REST endpoints have been removed: - /fcr:nodetypes
- /fcr:export
- /fcr:import
Additionally, the user-provided repository.json configuration file must be set as a system property. Unlike in previous releases, there is no default value. See Application Configuration for more details. The other non-backwards compatible change is the update to the messaging format, detailed in the section below. |
|
Changes
Messaging Interface
As the draft Fedora Messaging (SPI) specification moves toward finalization, the message serialization format has been modified to track the recommendations outlined in this document. This will affect any existing message consumers. There are four significant changes that messaging applications should be aware of:
...
One of the technical priorities [3] of Fedora is to define a well-specified application programming interface (API) against which client applications can be written and future server-side implementations can be created. This Fedora API should be clear and detailed enough such that a corresponding technology compatibility kit [4] (TCK) would be able to indicate if any Fedora implementation fulfills or diverges from the specification. With this in mind, several issues were addressed in this release that clean up Fedora's RESTful interaction [5].
An important particular change to note here is the move to use only weakly-validated ETags for RDF resources, in line with a correct interpretation of the HTTP specifications. This means that such ETags are no longer suitable for use with the If-Match
request header. Additionally, the extensions fcr:transform
has been marked as "deprecated" in favor of more robust tooling found in fcrepo-ldpath
.
Expand |
---|
title | Related JIRA tickets... |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | DuraSpace JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
maximumIssues | 20 |
---|
jqlQuery | filter=13608 13712 |
---|
serverId | c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 |
---|
|
|
Web Access Control
Documentation of Fedora's implementation of Web Access Controls is available on the wiki.
Expand |
---|
title | Related JIRA tickets... |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | DuraSpace JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
maximumIssues | 20 |
---|
jqlQuery | filter=13707 |
---|
serverId | c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 |
---|
|
|
Preservation
Performance
The Performance and Scale group has been testing various versions of Fedora, including the 4.6.0 release candidates. Recent work has focused on running our JMeter test plans by multiple sites and testing the impact of using a relational database (MySQL or PostgreSQL) instead of LevelDB. The performance of the databases has been at least as good as LevelDB, and typically scales much better. In addition, testing has identified scalability issues with containers that link to a large number of other containers, and is working to address that issue. The current status of testing is tracked in the wiki: Performance and Scalability Test Plans.
Expand |
---|
title | Related JIRA tickets... |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | DuraSpace JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
maximumIssues | 20 |
---|
jqlQuery | filter=13709 |
---|
serverId | c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 |
---|
|
|
Preservation
This release includes continuing support for various backend object stores. Default usage of that LevelDB backend has been removed, to encourage the intentional selection of a backend appropriate to the integration in hand.
...
Numerous refactorings, bugfixes, and clean-up tasks were addressed in this release [12]:
Expand |
---|
title | Related JIRA tickets... |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | DuraSpace JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
maximumIssues | 50 |
---|
jqlQuery | filter=13613 13711 |
---|
serverId | c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 |
---|
|
|
References
Complete Listing of Resolved Tickets
Expand |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | DuraSpace JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
maximumIssues | 70 |
---|
jqlQuery | filter=13800 |
---|
serverId | c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 |
---|
|
|
No Format |
---|
|