Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda

  1. Action: Create wiki page for implementations (including results of running against the TCK)

  2. Editors / Implementers conversation series
  3. Pull requests

    1. pr-324 - fixes html5validator
    2. pr-318 - Say LDP-RS must be created with LDP-NR on PUT (awaiting input from Benjamin Armintor)
    3. pr-285 - define fcrepo:PreferCompactLists IRI for Prefer header values ("more time needed"... until what?)
  4. Plan for addressing open

  5. Finalizing the Specification
    1. Specification compliance test suite

    2. Two or more implementations of the specification

    3. No unresolved, outstanding critical issues, as defined by the specification editors

      1. What is a realistic timeline?
  6. Open Recommendation issues

    1. issue-317Clarify  - Clarify LDPNR creation via PUT (PR-318, needs review from Daniel Lamb, Benjamin Armintor) ...should be good to go

    2. issue-260Define Prefer header URI for compact collection representation (PR-285) ...pending discussion?
    3. issue-172Clarify algorithm for finding authorizations

    4. issue-211 Clarify responses to external content requests with expiration date
    5. issue-280 Numbering scheme?
  7. Open No Milestone issues

Notes

Open Repositories 2018

Andrew Woods thinks a presentation would be good, but is it possible? Esmé Cowles is a maybe as long as he doesn't have to propose it, Simeon Warner is a no, Benjamin Armintor is a no, Andrew Woods is a no, Tom J. is a maybe. Is there a non-editor who would bring a long view of the project to the panel?

Spec Finalization

Test suite is not complete, per Andrew Woods

Danny B. and Scott P. have been chipping in. Contract is nearly up.

Simeon not able to get the suite to run yet - it's running against the community impl, but not passing. Possible problems there. Need to test the tests.

Andrew thinks test suite can be made available sooner. Need to think of ways of verifying the test suite.

Need to be tracking the implementations. Will solicit soft commitments to conformance by mid-April.

Open Recommendation Issues

#317: Waiting on Benjamin Armintor

#260: Punt for now

  •  #172: Can't continue waiting for Solid — Simeon Warner will draft updated language for review
    1. -314 - Add Ben Pennel to Contributors editorial - PR-322
    2. issue-313 - Editorial: reorder sub-sections in section 5. Resource Authorization - needs a PR but need to merge PR-320 and PR-321 first
    3. issue-312 - Clarify many links rather than many link headers - PR-321
    4. issue-311 - Clarify Location support on LDPCv POST - needs a PR
    5. issue-310 - 4.3.3 Not describing Accept-Post - needs a PR
    6. issue-309 - Clarify HTTP PUT requirements around types, subtypes, and interaction models - needs a PR
    7. issue-308 - Clarify expectations around external body content and Accept-Post response header - needs a PR
    8. issue-280 - Numbering scheme? - should be released as 1.0.0
    9. issue-172 - Clarify algorithm for finding authorizations - PR-320

  1. Open No Milestone issues

Notes

  1. Wiki page for implementations
    1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/wiki/Implementations
    2. We should have TCK in a good state before we host test results, but that would be a good improvement
    3. All: will try running the TCK against Fedora master and provide feedback
      1. It would be great if Benjamin Armintor and Simeon Warner would run the TCK against Cavendish/Trilpy
      2. It would be good if we can all do this by next week's meeting
  2. Editors/implementers conversation series
    1. Sounds like a good idea
    2. Andrew will schedule this
  3. Pull requests
    1. #324 ignoring html5 editor issue that cropped up in new release
      1. May need to rebase other PRs
  4. Recommendation Issues
    1. Waiting on Benjamin Armintor: #318, #322
    2. #321 - moving towards one big Link header, but the spec seems to favor that
    3. #320 - Daniel Lamb will request changes on that related to accessToGroup

...

Action Items

  •  ACTION (Daniel Lamb): To create PR: non-norm: LDPCv is both a timemap and a container, but does not allow POST