...
- Previously, cbeer had added this functionality, but it had been later removed
- Is data structured for this in modeshape to be reasonably performant?
- Mike: Was one of the agitators for this, opposed it being cut
- Some stuff is inferred, some not directly searchable
- What types of queries do we want to support?
- What exceptions are we willing to tolerate?
- Extension spec?
- Is it okay if it doesn't work consistently on server managed triples, like date fields?
- Just wants to be able to search dc:identifier. This would work, modeshape has an index that can be searched.
- Esme: Valkyie, making a list of queries that the repository needed.
- Needed queries
- all objects of given type
- Doing a search for dc:identifiers
- They will come up with a list of queries they need
- Needed queries
- Danny: Would it be helpful at this point to fill out the list
- Discuss some of the known limitations of modeshape's internal indices
- Mike: Last modified date is across two fields. Might need to normalize way stored in fedora. Need to work out if this is needed
- Esme: Types and containment triples are harder to make searchable
- Search for non-server managed triples that are directly assigned are easy.
- RDF type are not stored in the index modeshape maintains. That is inserted into responses.
- Use case: find all objects of a type in order to do bulk object on it
- Can't search on fcr namespace and ldp namespace. Might be okay to not support those, but it would be weird to have an LDP server that didn't support it
- Could add support for this in after if there is demand for it
- Discuss some of the known limitations of modeshape's internal indices
- Mike will start document to gather first pass at known limitations of implementation and requirements
5. Tickets requiring attention
- 2520
- Bethany would like more feedback on what expectations are for mimetype
- She will take another look at it to try to work through what the validation issue is
- 2650
- Bethany will take a look
- 2544
- there was a work around for that, using a different accept type. No one has strong feelings that it shouldn't be closed, so will make a note on ticket
- Josh - as a larger strategy, this is something we will need to address
- Paging mechanism is problematic in RDF rest api, but something we will need to deal with
- Work around okay for now, but many members issue needs to be addressed in future implementations
Action Items
Action: Check in with Andrew about completeness of the test suite
...