Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  1. Please squash a bug!

    Expand

    Jira
    serverDuraSpace JIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQueryfilter=13122
    serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5

  2. Tickets resolved this week:

    Expand

    Jira
    serverDuraSpace JIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQueryfilter=13111
    serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5

  3. Tickets created this week:

    Expand
    Jira
    serverDuraSpace JIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQueryfilter=13029
    serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5

Minutes

 

  1. Fedora 4.7.1 release - 
    1. Release manager - preferably a committer - any takers?  Put out a call for someone.  
  2. Maven GroupId for API-related code
    1. Skipping this till Unknown User (acoburn)'s around
  3. Extending WebAC: permissions inheritance via relationships other than ldp:contains
    1. Unknown User (bbpennel) put this on the list.  Using the webAC module with a PCDM with indirect containers.  The inheritance model in the webAC module is using ldp:contains. Can it be changed to work with other relationships? 
    2. Ben has not tested this specific use case, is just exploring it. 
    3. A. Soroka points out that that's a non-standard usage of LDP Containment.  It's specifically LDP containers - which may or may not be recorded as ldp:contains.  If this is an indirect container, then the triple ldp:contains should be created - is this a fcrepo bug?  
    4. What Ben wants to do should work now - so there's probably a bug in the code if it doesn't.  The property in the indirect container that's being used should represented ldp:contains. The current impl maye not be considering a larger set of conditions. 
    5. ldp:contains triple may not appear at all in this case - but webAC should still respect that containment relationship.  Many LDP containment relationships are represented by ldp:contains, but many are not and we need to make sure those cases are covered. 
    6. WebAC spec says you need to respect LDP containment, this specific use case may not currently be covered by the current impl.  
      1. https://github.com/solid/web-access-control-spec    

      2. https://github.com/solid/web-access-control-spec#acl-inheritance-algorithm

      3.  https://github.com/solid/web-access-control-spec#containers-and-inherited-acls

    7. What would happen in a multiple containment situation? 
    8. How are you finding and traversing containment relationships?  If there are limits, we need to be clear on what they are.  
    9. Action Item - Ben will test out this scenario and file a ticket depending on how it goes. 
    10. Action Item - if does fail in this scenario, find out who might need this use case and figure out how to fix it.  Smithsonian might be able to offer some insight here. 
  4. TCK planning
    1. Hacking event?
  5. Import/Export workshop accepted for Code4Lib 2017
  6. ...
  7. Status of "in-flight" tickets