...
- A. Soroka
- Jared Whiklo
- Danny Bernstein
- Esmé Cowles
- Osman Din
- Marcus Barnes
- Michael Durbin
- Bethany Seeger
- Unknown User (acoburn)
- Joe Harrington
- Longshou Situ
- Benjamin Armintor
- Yinlin Chen
- Daniel Lamb
- Kevin Ford
- Aaron Birkland
- Andy Wagner
- Nick Ruest
- Katherine Lynch
...
Please squash a bug!
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13122 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 Tickets resolved this week:
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13111 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 Tickets created this week:
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13029 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
Minutes
- Fedora 4.7.1 release -
- Release manager - preferably a committer - any takers? Put out a call for someone.
- Maven GroupId for API-related code
- Skipping this till Unknown User (acoburn)'s around
- Extending WebAC: permissions inheritance via relationships other than ldp:contains
- Unknown User (bbpennel) put this on the list. Using the webAC module with a PCDM with indirect containers. The inheritance model in the webAC module is using ldp:contains. Can it be changed to work with other relationships?
- Ben has not tested this specific use case, is just exploring it.
- A. Soroka points out that that's a non-standard usage of LDP Containment. It's specifically LDP containers - which may or may not be recorded as ldp:contains. If this is an indirect container, then the triple ldp:contains should be created - is this a fcrepo bug?
- What Ben wants to do should work now - so there's probably a bug in the code if it doesn't. The property in the indirect container that's being used should represented ldp:contains. The current impl maye not be considering a larger set of conditions.
- ldp:contains triple may not appear at all in this case - but webAC should still respect that containment relationship. Many LDP containment relationships are represented by ldp:contains, but many are not and we need to make sure those cases are covered.
- WebAC spec says you need to respect LDP containment, this specific use case may not currently be covered by the current impl.
- What would happen in a multiple containment situation?
- How are you finding and traversing containment relationships? If there are limits, we need to be clear on what they are.
- Action Item - Ben will test out this scenario and file a ticket depending on how it goes.
- Action Item - if does fail in this scenario, find out who might need this use case and figure out how to fix it. Smithsonian might be able to offer some insight here.
- TCK planning
- Hacking event?
- Import/Export workshop accepted for Code4Lib 2017
- ...
Status of "in-flight" tickets