Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Review of the requirements from Phase 1:
    • Transacting in RDF
    • Support including Binaries in export
    • Support references to other resourcesReferences
    • Discussion of external references and the creation of binary placeholder files
      • action item: Josh will create a ticket for handling this 
    • LDP contains predicate
    • Round-tripping: yes with an asterisk for the pair-tree issue (FCREPO-2240)
  • Outstanding issues: pairtree issue mentioned above
  • Open tickets:
    • Pairtree issue
    • Loss of namespace prefixes
    • Phase 2 requirements (Bagit)
  • Getting more stakeholder feedback:
    • Would a template such as that employed for release testing be useful?
    • This There is a danger that this could box them into testing in a pre-defined way that is not helpful.
    • Action Item: Josh will create a single wiki page with links to the tooling and instructions that to which stakeholders can be directed to.
    • It seems reasonable to ping folks who signed up but who have not yet provided feedback.
  • Prioritizing work for December sprint:
    • The consensus was that cleanup of the open issues is a requirement before the Bagit work starts
    • The bug fixes may not be an enormous amount of work but with the current commitments it may not be possible to get to the Bagit phase of work in December
    • If we can get more developer commitments we can hopefully get to some of Phase 2 as well
  • Additional interested potential stakeholders