...
- 2015 Targets
Migration - next six months
Andrew
4.0 release greenfield
4.1 release - targeted for OR - get Fedora 3 to Fedora 4
Migration Discussion
4.1
squash bugs
new features
Migration
Establish pilots
which features need to be migrated
get many Fedora 3 institutions involved
documentation needs
tooling needs
approach - in terms of objects
use a connector, helps eliminates concerns
connector talks to Fedora 3 REST API
regardless of some configuration variables
will simplify the transfer of assets
need for parallel systems
will need servers and storage
can't do an in-place upgrade
it's a content migration
it's a software upgrade
What do we tell people who want to stay with XML vs. RDF?
You can't keep all forms of XML, like inline XML
Fedora 3 audit trail, can become XML data stream, but not inline
Break out Fedora 3 features
do some early analysis, what is going to be possible
requirements for Fedora 3 to Fedora 4
in training, documented considerations for upgrades
security policies
versioning
disseminators
how data and functionality map from 3 to 4
Migration Scenarios
Greenfield installation
upgrade to Fedora 4 and replace functionality over time
Hydra
could have made Fedora 4 look like Fedora 3
strategic decision to move to Fedora 4 approach
continuum of migration options
consensus - quick analysis to determine migration needs
find common needs
migration working group - consensus
Migration Complexity
consensus it will take time to determine scope
Systems Administrators
Application Functionality, Compatibility, Refactoring
Content Migration
Hydra and Islandora - will be easiest community to migrate
Penn State - looking at using Hydra as migration tool
What is possible in the next 6 months?
Moving Content to a new system
can play with content, even if you haven't moved to a new system
Have pilots
working through migration
specific features and capabilities
content
After 6 months
have a few examples of sucessful migration
Documentation
Identify Migration Types
Greenfield
Hydra/Islandora
Custom
Wild West
Rebuild/Refactor - rewrite and ingest
New functionality - incorporate back into Fedora/Hydra
Promote the concept of community development when appropriate, recognize and respect the need for institutions to locally customize when required.
What if there are significant issues related to Fedora 3 migration?
at some point the community will have difficulty in supporting
Fedora 3 beyond security patches
Migration consultancy - At OR2015, have a room for migration support
"Upgration" - Software Upgrade and Content Migration - a new term
ACTION ITEMS
Survey
collect information, quickly canvas the community
identify use cases, common services and approaches
keep as simple as reasonably possible
some demographic data
geography, size of installation
intended for leadership group
ship out after Monday January 12th
get responses back by February 1, 2015 (??? to be finalized by David and Andrew)
2. Establish Migration Working Group
Code4Lib - awareness booth
OR2015 - upgration booth
Fedora 4.1 Release
- Fedora 3 to 4 migrations
- Bug fixes
- Features
- Which priorities (established last year) are still relevant?
- What will be the process for prioritizing feature development?
- Engage the community
- Technical use cases - need to have some tie to Fedora 4 development
- Connect to leadership and strategic priorities
- Some evolution in software development
- rotating group of developers
- need to balance priority needs with developer resources
- Discussion setting priorities
- New Candidate features:
- LDP-Paging
- Audit service
- API partitioning
- Web Access Control
- Remote/Asynchronous storage - some discussion and consensus, Indiana and WGBH funded project
- How to support feature development from staffing/leadership perspective
- Which priorities (established last year) are still relevant?
- Fedora 3 to 4 migrations
- Bug fixes
- Features
- Which priorities (established last year) are still relevant?
- What will be the process for prioritizing feature development?
- Engage the community
- Technical use cases - need to have some tie to Fedora 4 development
- Connect to leadership and strategic priorities
- Some evolution in software development and priority setting
- rotating group of developers
- balance priorities with developer resources
- Discussion setting priorities
- New Candidate features:
- LDP-Paging
- Audit service
- API partitioning
- Web Access Control
- Remote/Asynchronous storage - some discussion and consensus, Indiana and WGBH funded project
- How to support feature development from staffing/leadership perspective
- Which priorities (established last year) are still relevant?
- Migration Pilots
Actions