Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Here you will find documentation on analysis comparing and contrasting data patterns shapes found in the SVDE PCC data with decisions made in the Sinopia PCC Templates in March 2021.

...

  1. A spreadsheet was programmatically created by Justin Littman (Stanford) from the Sinopia PCC Templates according to the DCMI Tabular Application Profile specification. A copy of the spreadsheet was created titled (March 2021 Comparison of PCC Sinopia Templates and SVDE Data) was used to evaluate row by row if SVDE PCC SVDE data has triples conforming to the template. N. Note, B. no systematic attempt has been made to see if every pattern in SVDE is captured reflected in the Sinopia PCC templates.
  2. Analysis of the SVDE PCC data was performed using SPARQL queries on the LD4P cache available at: http://services.ld4l.org/fuseki/dataset.html?tab=query&ds=/PCC
  3. Every attempt was made to account for different patterns for bf:Works in the SVDE data, but the patterns may or may not be too different to reconcile neatly with the Sinopia PCC Works patterns. This reflects the need for the community to decide on similar patterns for reflecting the WEMI model in BF, assuming this is a goal.
  4. The bflc:Relationship pattern to capture relationships (between Works and other works, and Instances and other Instances) in the templates and in the SVDE data are not intuitive. There should be further analysis to make sure and community discussion about the extent to which the bflc:Relationship pattern is used consistently under similar circumstances.should be used and/or avoided. 
  5. The use of bf:issuance is seems to not be consistently applied for Serials in the SVDE data, and perhaps Monographs. We need to clear up what pattern the community should use to confidently signal one or the other; the PCC templates use This made it difficult to confidently say the SVDE data complied with the PCC templates usage of http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/issuance/mono and http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/issuance/serl for monographs and serial respectively . In some cases, this made it difficult to confidently say the SVDE data complied.Analysis of the SVDE PCC data was performed using SPARQL queries on the LD4P cache available at: http://services.ld4l.org/fuseki/dataset.html?tab=query&ds=/PCCas bf:issuance value. We need to solidify what pattern the community should use to confidently signal this information.


General Comment/Questions

...