Page History

\[11:00\] <cwilper> Note: We're starting this meeting soon, anyone's free to call in: [http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/2010-03-09+-+Special+Topic+-+3.4+Scoping+Kickoff]
\[11:06\] <sbayliss> [http://www.fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/Feb+23-24+2010%2C+London+Committer+Meeting]
\[11:10\] <cwilper> ECM: Green items seem to fit for 3.4
\[11:14\] <cwilper> SDef/Dep Improvement: Dependency on module architecture rework
\[11:16\] * awoods\_ is now known as awoods
\[11:28\] <cwilper> ...SDef/Dep Improvement: For 3.4, shift to use module framework idioms but no big change in functionality, positions us for bigger items for 4.0 (extra verbs, etc)
\[11:29\] <eddies> is our maven repo down? see fc-users
\[11:32\] <awoods> [https://fedora-commons.org/m2/index.html]
\[11:32\] <awoods> appears so
\[11:32\] <cwilper> Module framework: Spring for 3.4 seems tractable and not too disruptive, let's shoot for it.
\[11:32\] <cwilper> (looking into m2 issue)
\[11:34\] <cwilper> High level storage: Some cleanup/prep can happen for 3.4, but major move to highlevel storage (and versioning discussion) is a 4.0 thing
\[11:43\] <cwilper> 503 & Retry-after: Yes for 3.4, creating JIRA issue for it...need an impl that supports it (externally-developed)
\[11:50\] <barmintor> [http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/main/rdf/index.htm]
\[11:51\] <cwilper> Semweb: Green and some blue items fair game for 3.4, quad store and graph hierarchy better for 4.0
\[11:53\] <barmintor> CModel-based triple generation is a desired item under both SDef/Dep Improvement and Semweb
\[12:03\] <cwilper> FESL: Currentl stuff Steve's working on is in scope for 3.4, round2 FESL=not counting on for 3.4, funding question
\[12:11\] <cwilper> ideas for community involvement:
\[12:11\] <cwilper> Bill: Dev challenges for 3.4?
\[12:16\] <cwilper> Andrew: Release candidates?&nbsp; Chris possibly at code freeze: don't necessitate a physical file release, could have people get it from svn at code freeze time.&nbsp; Steve: tagging would be good.
\[12:23\] <awoods> special topic candidates for next week:
\[12:23\] <awoods> Module Arch Development?
\[12:27\] <cwilper> Aaron: Versioning
\[12:27\] <cwilper> Ben: 20mins or so on SDep/Def, not enough for full meeting yet
\[12:29\] <cwilper> Dan: Invite Northwestern folks, and Paul re:Islandora
\[12:29\] <cwilper> Steve: Further down the line: SemWeb area...not ready yet
\[12:33\] <cwilper> RE: Release timing: Agreement on getting a code freeze/release candidate out 1 or 2 weeks before OR.&nbsp; One option is to release just prior, another option is to use OR'10 as a chance to get the wider community involved with testing/wrap-up on 3.4.&nbsp; In either case, we can still use OR'10 to start getting people involved early in the cycle for 4.0 topics.