Advanced Tables - Table Plus

Topic	Lead
Review pilot guidelines and answer any questions	David
Discuss NLM pilot details What are the desired outcomes? What are the timelines? What is our communication plan?	David
Next steps	All

Notes

Desired Outcomes:

Success would mean Fedora6 is something we can use and the steps for migration would be clear
Something we can use:
- Requirements:
  - Migration performance
    - how many objects representing
    - how much data migrated in
    - how much time
- Are the development targets outlined by the Fedora 6 design summary aligned with NLM's needs?
- Concern around external content
  - Current F3 stack makes heavy use of external content
  - How to use an external content model with the Fedora6 / OCFL design?
  - Would we (NLM) have to bring in all the external binaries into Fedora ? Or is would it make sense to use external content?
    - OCFL objects can point to external content (via a URI)
    - NLM would always have the option to bring in the content into OCFL later.
    - Having binaries and metadata collocated is a principle of OCFL not a requirement
- Concerns around RDF and LDP:
  - NLM wants to use own URI's for subjects.
  - Other concerns detailed in this discussion: http://fedora-commons.1317035.n2.nabble.com/fedora-community-URLs-as-URIs-for-digital-objects-td7585842.html

Actions

Danny Bernstein to bring in the question of external binaries in OCFL in the weekly tech call. Pilot partners should feel free to raise the issue on in the #fedora6-pilots slack channel